原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-10 11:19 PM 發表
禾吾sick英文
原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-10 11:19 PM 發表
禾吾sick英文
原帖由 johnny.C 於 2009-9-10 11:23 PM 發表
聽人講你英文好勁
原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-10 23:37 發表
好明顯哩個甚至唔係謠傳,只係可能你發夢,或者認錯第二個
kath係2000fun o既小學雞代表,專講歪理,下刪十數萬粗口,邊鬼到識野
kath識英文,邊到有人信
原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-10 11:37 PM 發表
好明顯哩個甚至唔係謠傳,只可能係你發夢,或者認錯第二個
kath係2000fun o既小學雞代表,專講歪理,下刪十數萬粗口,邊鬼到識野
kath識英文,邊到有人信
原帖由 澳漩 於 2009-9-10 11:42 PM 發表
咩呀...你唔係識engilsh咩
原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-10 11:59 PM 發表
小學雞又點會識呢?
得閒好似哩d會員咁,講下粗口,鬧下其他自己唔喜歡o既會員,一見佢發帖就立即上身,瘋狂咒罵一番咪幾好,完全唔需要語言,仿如嬰孩一樣
?原帖由 御狩犽ζ楓閣 於 2009-9-11 12:05 AM 發表
咁造物者又點黎?問佢地呢一條問題,佢地咪又係搬D冇事實根據既傳說出黎答......
原帖由 御狩犽ζ楓閣 於 2009-9-11 12:05 AM 發表
咁造物者又點黎?問佢地呢一條問題,佢地咪又係搬D冇事實根據既傳說出黎答......
原帖由 零木葉 於 2009-9-11 12:14 AM 發表
議事論事
姑勿論神的存在與否
宗教只係一個精神支柱/寄托..
唔需要太刻意同人講我地個神係存在
就係因為咁既原因耶教先令人咁反感
同時加埋佢地個d洗腦..之類既教派力量令到人對佢既態度更惡劣
原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-11 12:14 AM 發表
查實樓主個帖唔係討論進化論vs創造論,亦唔係質疑段片o既論者所提出o既論點
點睇佢都似係純問英文
有關創造論vs進化論o既討論,本來打算今日開,但突然比較忙,所以順延至聽日
亦希望一d好似你咁講實學,懂用語文,理 ...
剩係9UP夠了得原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-11 12:14 AM 發表
查實樓主個帖唔係討論進化論vs創造論,亦唔係質疑段片o既論者所提出o既論點
點睇佢都似係純問英文
有關創造論vs進化論o既討論,本來打算今日開,但突然比較忙,所以順延至聽日
亦希望一d好似你咁講實學,懂用語文,理 ...
原帖由 御狩犽ζ楓閣 於 2009-9-11 12:17 AM 發表
經常性讚揚神的偉大......但一切都只是所謂聖經留傳落黎
有幾分真幾分假,冇時光機,真係空口說白話,冇親眼見過都唔會信
原帖由 零木葉 於 2009-9-11 12:29 AM 發表
先表明..我係反耶教的,亦好討厭耶教
講真唔真真正正拎出實證,只係純粹鳩up佢地認為對既事我係絕唔會認同:smilie_:):
係我角度,聖經只係一本科幻小說
就好似進化論咁,一直以黎耶教班友態度幾強硬,係咁話呢個理論 ...
原帖由 御狩犽ζ楓閣 於 2009-9-11 12:17 AM 發表
經常性讚揚神的偉大......但一切都只是所謂聖經留傳落黎
有幾分真幾分假,冇時光機,真係空口說白話,冇親眼見過都唔會信
小弟乜都唔識
原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-11 12:38 AM 發表
中國人三千年前有一種叫做儒家哲學的孔孟思想,亦中國人來說係一種至高無上的思想觀
有云 : 推恩,推己及人,教化四夷
對於中國人o黎講佢地都必然覺得儒家仁義思想係正道,佢地o既先賢亦都教佢地要將哩種觀念傳播開去 ...
原帖由 御狩犽ζ楓閣 於 2009-9-11 12:34 AM 發表
言之雖無章,字意亦明瞭
我係唔討厭亦唔喜歡果類中立派
我剩係唔鍾意佢一味讚揚神同埋死撐無據之理
如果真係有料到,使乜日日係到讚讚讚
原帖由 御狩犽ζ楓閣 於 2009-9-11 12:44 AM 發表
打錯字,先入為主
對於閣下飽讀詩書,芥蒂煥然冰釋之能力,小弟真的不敢恭維
預期討論凡俗世事,小的更想與朋把酒邀明月
原帖由 零木葉 於 2009-9-11 12:48 AM 發表
好救命..
唉我真係唔知我接觸既人數同事實成唔成正比
就好似早輪我聽收音機..
有間餐廳既老闆娘比電台live訪問
個老闆娘經常係說話最尾加句:「係囉..係呀..真係多謝神賜比我地食物」
至於期間佢地講個d咩就 ...
原帖由 零木葉 於 2009-9-11 12:50 AM 發表
唔好理佢啦..唔夠佢鬥嫁
論壇公告:對於反智的帖子，不理會、不回覆、不去看就成了。
Authors of the highest eminence seem to be fully satisfied with the view that each species has been independently created. To my mind it accords better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the Creator, that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining the birth and death of the individual. When I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Silurian system was deposited, they seem to me to become ennobled. Judging from the past, we may safely infer that not one living species will transmit its unaltered likeness to a distant futurity. And of the species now living very few will transmit progeny of any kind to a far distant futurity; for the manner in which all organic beings are grouped, shows that the greater number of species of each genus, and all the species of many genera, have left no descendants, but have become utterly extinct. We can so far take a prophetic glance into futurity as to foretel that it will be the common and widely-spread species, belonging to the larger and dominant groups, which will ultimately prevail and procreate new and dominant species. As all the living forms of life are the lineal descendants of those which lived long before the Silurian epoch, we may feel certain that the ordinary succession by generation has never once been broken, and that no cataclysm has desolated the whole world. Hence we may look with some confidence to a secure future of equally inappreciable length. And as natural selection works solely by and for the good of each being, all corporeal and mental endowments will tend to progress towards perfection.
It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us. These laws, taken in the largest sense, being Growth with Reproduction; inheritance which is almost implied by reproduction; Variability from the indirect and direct action of the external conditions of life, and from use and disuse; a Ratio of Increase so high as to lead to a Struggle for Life, and as a consequence to Natural Selection, entailing Divergence of Character and the Extinction of less-improved forms. Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows. There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.
原帖由 異地遊人 於 2009-9-11 01:17 AM 發表
上帝是偉大的
因為佢造就左一個地方比人識女仔
原帖由 異地遊人 於 2009-9-11 01:21 AM 發表
同時上帝是令人討厭的
因為佢令虔誠o既少女拒絕婚前性行為
原帖由 異地遊人 於 2009-9-11 01:17 AM 發表
上帝是偉大的
因為佢造就左一個地方比人識女仔
原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-11 01:24 AM 發表
好心你,有高手山招,你就行開啦
讓個位畀個d以我心寫我想,但詞不達意o既會員,會需任何理據排解下佢心中千萬o既鬱悶咪算囉
原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-11 03:24 AM 發表
好心你,有高手山招,你就行開啦
讓個位畀個d以我心寫我想,但詞不達意o既會員,會需任何理據排解下佢心中千萬o既鬱悶咪算囉
原帖由 z型仔z 於 2009-9-10 11:33 PM 發表
雖然我信基督
不過我唔buy呢條友講d野...
" i remain believe in god"
字面睇"我仍然相信上帝"..但係達文西咁聰明..我唔係幾知個深層意思-.-
原帖由 kath 於 2009-9-11 05:31 AM 發表
其實可唔可以唔好好似其他個d嬰孩式o既會員咁,只係識得不停咁叫喊,一紓自己心中多年鬱悶 -- 飲奶唔夠飽,排便後無人幫手換片,媽媽唔抱,無公仔玩,肚腩太大食唔到腳扯等...
從佢o既言論入面,搵出你唔同意o ...
原帖由 御狩犽ζ楓閣 於 2009-9-11 12:05 AM 發表
咁造物者又點黎?問佢地呢一條問題,佢地咪又係搬D冇事實根據既傳說出黎答......
| 歡迎光臨 2000FUN論壇 (https://www.2000fun.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X1.5.1 |
