關於IELTS同GCE

altc3000

原帖由 異地遊人 於 2009-6-29 02:48 AM 發表

....唔知呀,
我題目係the favorite type of movie
=>愛情電影, 用溝女用果d 字就ok

佢係等你自由發揮
定係吹水咁既形式?

altc3000

原帖由 邪惡天使 於 2009-6-29 02:49 AM 發表

係既
同時間 呢d topic 可以扯到較高分 亦可以扯到幾低分

冇錯
我永遠都係扯到幾低分
我作文主要tense問題-.-

kath

原帖由 異地遊人 於 2009-6-29 02:45 AM 發表

唔駛搵佢
佢唔係律師幫唔到你
你搵定律師幫你辯護啦

咁要睇下中唔中先得啦
Chapter:        21        Title:        DEFAMATION ORDINANCE        Gazette Number:       
Section:        26        Heading:        Justification        Version Date:        30/06/1997


In an action for libel or slander in respect of words containing 2 or more distinct charges against the plaintiff, a defence of justification shall not fail by reason only that the truth of every charge is not proved if the words not proved to be true do not materially injure the plaintiff's reputation having regard to the truth of the remaining charges.
(Added 33 of 1961 s. 11)
[cf. 1952 c. 66 s. 5 U.K.]
http://www.legislation.gov.hk/eng/home.htm

kath

原帖由 邪惡天使 於 2009-6-29 02:45 AM 發表

咁argumentative writing 點都有既....

有技巧
但個d題目同個評分準則搞到根本就唔係考你英文好唔好

altc3000

原帖由 kath 於 2009-6-29 02:54 AM 發表

有技巧
但個d題目同個評分準則搞到根本就唔係考你英文好唔好

呢樣野我好認同
就同通識差唔多
覺得你好既咪比分
唔好既咪一分都冇

異地遊人

原帖由 kath 於 2009-6-29 04:52 AM 發表

咁要睇下中唔中先得啦
Chapter:        21        Title:        DEFAMATION ORDINANCE        Gazette Number:       
Section:        26        Heading:        Justification        Version Date:        30/06/1997


In an action for libel or slander in respect  ...

咁都唔injure 我!??
著眼點只在於materially 呢個字

同埋呢個只係defence
你同你律師慢慢傾

[ 本帖最後由 異地遊人 於 2009-6-29 05:00 AM 編輯 ]

chanyaya2005

你應該答中共文學嘛

異地遊人

原帖由 altc3000 於 2009-6-29 04:50 AM 發表

佢係等你自由發揮
定係吹水咁既形式?

好似比2分鐘我9up

kath

原帖由 邪惡天使 於 2009-6-29 02:49 AM 發表

係既
同時間 呢d topic 可以扯到較高分 亦可以扯到幾低分

哩d題目無主觀評分o既stand point
考得差只係因為英文唔好

原帖由 altc3000 於 2009-6-29 02:50 AM 發表

冇錯
我永遠都係扯到幾低分
我作文主要tense問題-.-

動詞其實不是一種大難的東西
只係因為中文動詞無時性
所以一般以中文為母語o既人都會覺得好難掌握

altc3000

原帖由 異地遊人 於 2009-6-29 02:56 AM 發表

好似比2分鐘我9up

之後吹水 ?
係就正
最鐘意吹水

異地遊人

原帖由 altc3000 於 2009-6-29 04:57 AM 發表

之後吹水 ?
係就正
最鐘意吹水

   唔記得...你上網睇

altc3000

原帖由 kath 於 2009-6-29 02:56 AM 發表

哩d題目無主觀評分o既stand point
考得差只係因為英文唔好


動詞其實不是一種大難的東西
只係因為中文動詞無時性
所以一般以中文為母語o既人都會覺得好難掌握

仲唔夠死咩-.-
我考英文作文
次次都死係tense呢方面
有咩方法可以改善除左作多d之外= =

altc3000

原帖由 異地遊人 於 2009-6-29 02:58 AM 發表

   唔記得...你上網睇

In the Speaking test, you have a conversation with a certified Examiner. It is interactive and as close to a real-life situation as a test can get. The test is 11 to 14 minutes long with three parts. In Part 1, you answer questions about yourself and your family. In Part 2, you speak about a topic. In Part 3, you have a longer discussion on the topic. Below is a sample of Part 2 – speaking on a topic.

Speaking, Part 2 sample

Describe a teacher who has greatly influenced you in your education.

You should say:
1.  where you met them

2.  what subject they taught

3.  what was special about them

4.  explain why this person influenced you so much.

You will have to talk about the topic for 1 to 2 minutes. You have one minute to think about what you are going to say. You can make some notes if you wish.

好似唔係好難咁-.-

邪惡天使

原帖由 kath 於 2009-6-29 02:56 AM 發表

哩d題目無主觀評分o既stand point
考得差只係因為英文唔好


動詞其實不是一種大難的東西
只係因為中文動詞無時性
所以一般以中文為母語o既人都會覺得好難掌握

某程度上係既..
但佢都會睇你content夠唔夠rich同有冇off track

kath

原帖由 異地遊人 於 2009-6-29 02:55 AM 發表

咁都唔injure 我!??
著眼點只在於materially 呢個字

同埋呢個只係defence
你同你律師慢慢傾

你令我諗起28/6個集農夫小兒戲
真好玩

[ 本帖最後由 kath 於 2009-6-29 03:02 AM 編輯 ]

邪惡天使

原帖由 altc3000 於 2009-6-29 02:59 AM 發表

In the Speaking test, you have a conversation with a certified Examiner. It is interactive and as close to a real-life situation as a test can get. The test is 11 to 14 minutes long with three parts ...

你呢個係咩exam??

異地遊人

原帖由 kath 於 2009-6-29 05:01 AM 發表

你令我諗起28/6個集農夫小兒戲
真好玩

唔春知咩黎

異地遊人

原帖由 altc3000 於 2009-6-29 04:59 AM 發表

In the Speaking test, you have a conversation with a certified Examiner. It is interactive and as close to a real-life situation as a test can get. The test is 11 to 14 minutes long with three parts ...

又唔係考你急才.....
咁深做咩

邪惡天使

just a tv programme...

異地遊人

原帖由 邪惡天使 於 2009-6-29 05:02 AM 發表
just a tv programme...

咁28/6 佢發生咩時先

講d 明知人地唔明既野不如唔好講