- 閱讀權限
- 50
- 最後登錄
- 25-11-9
- 精華
- 0
- UID
- 616910
- 帖子
- 2306
- 積分
- 2508
- 註冊時間
- 06-4-12
- 在線時間
- 1051 小時
- UID
- 616910
- 帖子
- 2306
- 積分
- 2508
- Good
- 475
- 註冊時間
- 06-4-12
- 在線時間
- 1051 小時
|
http://www.facebook.com/#/group.php?gid=2346538575&ref=mf
The League of Social Democrats Chairman the Hon. Wong Yuk-Man 黃毓民 condemns fellow legislators the Hon. Wong Sing Chi 黃成智, and the Hon. Priscilla Leung 梁美芬, as well as Yan Fook Church 恩福堂 pastor the Rev. W.C. Leung 蘇穎智, calling them rubbish Christians 垃圾基督徒.
Youtube: http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=4ptHUWZILL8
Server 1: http://dl6.hkreporter.com/files/new/wym_2009-01-12_2_0217.mp3
Server 2: http://dl5.hkreporter.com/files/new/wym_2009-01-12_2_0217.mp3
=======================
From HK Falcon:
就「明光社」的《維護家庭宣言》，想不到在「浸大宗哲系」有講師敢站出來恨批其不是。各位可由此連結聽到，這講師在民間電台的節目錄音。
http://www.wowin.org/public_html/oldrec/2008-08-06.mp3
當中理據及立論也很有理由。
其實「明光社」的大腦，就在「浸大宗哲系」。這講師敢站出來說「不」，要很大勇氣，真的令小弟敬佩！
==================================
Please join us in condemning Wong Sing Chi's total disregard of social justice.
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=52295309809
立法會議員黃成智反對政府提出涵蓋保障同性同居者的《家庭暴力條例》修訂草案，以追隨教會立場為理由，帶頭歧視同志，容許暴力行為。黃成智當日由沙田東選民投票選出，立法會為全港市民服務，教會何德何能可以插上一手？黃成智此種可恥行為，有如明光社的德行，肯定自食其果。
==================================
JUSTICE (10/21/2008)!!!
淫審評級司法覆核勝訴
高等法院今早判《明報》與《中大學生報》前總編輯提出司法覆核勝訴，而有關報章亦毋須發還至淫審處重新評級。法官在判詞中指，淫審處為兩宗個案評級時的手法，違反了有關指引，未有清楚表明刊物哪一部分屬不雅，因而令評級有所缺失，有關評級亦因此要撤銷。
The Standard
Court quashes university sex articles ruling
Nickkita Lau
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
The High Court has quashed an indecency ruling by the Obscene Articles Tribunal against the Chinese University publication Student Press and Ming Pao newspaper.
But the university said the ruling did not justify the content of the articles - students' views on sex, including bestiality and incest - printed in February and March last year, because the indecent classification was only overturned due to a procedural flaw.
A spokeswoman would not say if the university would retract letters sent to editorial staff last year advising them to "avoid upsetting the public."
The university said last night it respects the freedom of speech of students and faculty members, but editorial staff should be aware of moral standards and conduct themselves with dignity and self-discipline.
But former Student Press chief editor Tsang Chiu-wai demanded the university apologize for its criticism of students after the tribunal issued interim classifications that the February and March 2007 issues were indecent.
High Court Judge Johnson Lam Man-hon quashed the indecency rulings, saying the tribunal had failed to give a proper identification of the indecent parts in the publications. The articles also contained photos and illustrations.
The tribunal also ruled part of a Ming Pao supplement published on May 13, 2007, with articles relating to the university controversy to be indecent.
The publications contained more than one article. Lam said the Obscene Articles Ordinance provides for classification of an article - not a publication.
"A submission in respect of several articles is not a proper submission," Lam said. "The tribunal also functions as the protector of public interest in the preservation of public morals and the prevention of dissemination of indecent materials to juveniles, and dissemination of obscene materials in general.
"There is no room for arbitrariness or slackness."
He suggested the administration consider whether more resources should be deployed to maintain the proper and efficient functioning of the tribunal.
Ming Pao welcomed the judgment. Chief editor Cheung Kin-por urged the tribunal to clearly identify indecent contents and give reasons when making rulings because the media act according to these judgments.
=================================
淫審處和自以為是的明光社，這些年內三番四次的衝擊香港既有文化。就像中大學生報的處理手段，我們不期然令人認為淫審處是為政治服務而存在、並以只欺壓弱勢社群為宗旨，而不知所謂的明光社則以為自己是道德判官﹗
我不是說中大學生報是絕對正確、沒有問題，畢竟在這個社會裡，每個人的道德標準也不同。但是，淫審處和明光社的所作所為實在令人反感。在中大學生報上，淫審處的判決，指刊物的評級不需要根據整份刊物的宏觀意識而作評級，只要刊物裡某部份為淫褻及不雅，那整份刊物也需被評為淫褻及不雅。
社會不滿的聲音積壓久了，社會上不期然有人以夷制夷，利用中大情色報的判決，借助聖經的權威去衝擊淫審處。畢竟普通法理論上的一視同仁的精神下，中大事件的判決，就是為聖經評級的先例。現在實在看不出有甚麼原因，聖經不需要被評級﹗淫審處的作繭自綁、明光社的詞窮理屈，正正凸顯了香港社會上的荒謬﹗
一天內一千四百宗投訴，明眼人也看得出，聖經的內容是怎樣，到底是不是淫褻不雅，根本毫不重要。重要的是，聖經的地位與權威性是如何的超然﹗最後無論結果如何，淫審處最後也要賠上應有的威嚴、淫審處處長將要賠上自己的政治前途﹗
再要說投訴聖經的人無知及幼稚，才是真的無知及幼稚。
Petition to condemn The Society for Truth and Light:
我的生命已接近尾聲，在離開這個世界之前，我只想試圖向年青人指出完全依附於基要組織的危險性，無論那組織是宗教性或是政治性的。基要派只會傷害自己和傷害別人，它一點好處也沒有。只要擁有開放的思維，和在不傷害別人的情況下保持我們思想自由和行動自由的決心，我們就可以倚靠自己的力量和自己的努力，去面對一生中所有的問題。我們無須去信靠人為的醫治、所謂的神蹟、令人生畏的教義。無人知道神是否真的存在，但我們可以保持思想開放，只要我們在這世間做好事，我們就無所畏懼。只要令其他人快樂，我們就可以令自己快樂，以及獲得美滿的生命。
網上請願天天有，我卻少於簽署。但今早看到這個「強烈譴責明光社佔領香港道德平台成為標準」的，我倒願意。
http://www.petitiononline.com/mingkong/petition.html
(in Chinese)
[ 本帖最後由 :o) 於 10-2-1 04:08 PM 編輯 ] |
|
發表於 10-2-1 04:05 PM
發表於 10-2-1 04:19 PM
