香港大學學生會回應梁振英宴請校務委員

L@尼亞

【就梁振英宴請校務委員之回應】

致梁振英先生：

　　聞悉足下有意以香港大學校監身份，宴請校務委員會一眾委員。足下僭居特首三年間，民意鼎沸，怨聲載道，非但沒有自省罪己，問責下臺；竟在風頭火勢之際，企圖粉飾太平，實在教人啼笑皆非。

　　本會會長身兼校務委員會普選本科生代表，雖在受邀之列；然而孟子有曰：「不仁而在高位，是播其惡於眾也。」方今凶人在位，民不奠居；足下胡作非為，罄竹難書。我等義無赴會伴食、充撐場面之理。

　　身為一區之首，足下早前罔顧身份，於施政報告點名批評本會官方刊物《學苑》，妄以公權力打壓言論自由。近日有媒體問及足下會否警惕學子，足下答曰校監僅屬榮譽之職，職責不包括與同學就憲制問題對話。本校校長馬斐森教授尊重學生言論自由，矢志恪守院校自主；足下意圖以校監高高在上姿態，戮力侵凌本會事務，二者相判，高下立見。黃鐘委地，豺狼當道。本校百年風華，有此賣港獨夫盤據校監之座，吾等與有辱焉，榮將何在？

　　早年足下職司香港城市大學校董會主席，專制獨裁，荼毒友校，師生惶惶終日，劣評如潮。當年「今日城大，明日香港」預言終究一語成讖。足下藉小圈子加持，以區區六八九票竊位，誠信破產，亡德作賊。學府之內，足下縱容大學資助委員會干預院校發展，強加莘莘學子以沉重學債。黌宮以外，足下敗壞綱紀撕裂社會，謊報輿情賤視民意，釀成八三一落閘，催谷九二八抗命。過往七十九日，特區政權恃建制暴力，打壓光明磊落之義舉。前線同學頭破血流，幾有性命之虞；秋後算帳接踵而來，彌漫白色恐怖。

凡此種種，即令市井五歲小孩，皆知足下「刻毒、無知、冷血、涼薄」，不配為牧民之長。

　　謹此明志，其意如此，並以為絕。本會同時敦請師友時刻銘記校訓「??格物」，無負本校源遠流長、傳承日久之清譽風骨。

香港大學學生會
二零一五年二月一日

L@尼亞

Mr. Leung,

Greeted with a dining invitation to all fellow HKU Councillors, we are lost in words for your futile attempt to ridicule peace. Within the 3-year term as the HKSAR Chief Executive, our society has yet to enjoy peace, but is rather overloaded with rage and discontent. Regardless of the ever-growing social grievance, it’s disappointing that this chief executive who is supposed to hold accountable to his people, refrained from stepping down for his wrongdoing. What puts us at more unease is that, he wishfully expect that such an occasion would alleviate all recent unrest, which left us wordless.

When a man destitute of benevolence is in a high station, he thereby disseminates his wickedness among all below him. Though our President, the undergraduate representative at HKU Council, was also invited, we yet find no proper justification for her to attend an occasion that merely papers over cracks of such an feeble-minded, unscrupulous position holder.

As the chief of the city, sir you abused the authority by criticising our official publication “Undergrad”, which is a despicable attempt to suppress the freedom of speech totally unsuited for a man of such stature. disregards of his identity. In response to the recent enquiries from the media, sir you remarked that the Chancellor is barely of honorary nature and need not discuss with schoolmates and has no obligation to discuss on constitutional issues. A stark contrast would be the honourable Professor Mathieson, the President and Vice-Chancellor, expressed his respect towards institutional autonomy and the students’ freedom of speech. Disappointingly his infringement to students' affairs is manifestly underhand. We therefore, were left with much shame to have a Chancellor who betrays every member of Hong Kong.

Previously as the Council Chairman at the City University of Hong Kong, sir your dictatorship afflicted the school like contagious diseases, enveloping the academia in terrible fear, with negative comments flooding in. What happened at the City University mirrors today’s Hong Kong. Misappropriating the CE seat with a mere 689 vote serves to prove only your moral bankruptcy. Your indifference and disrespect towards public opinion was the sole cause of the 8.31 NPCSC decision, which catalysed the subsequent rebellion. In those 79 days, the government abused its power to violently suppress honourable acts of civil disobedience. Students fighting for justice were beaten and wounded, soaked in blood; persecutions come one after the other, white terror loomed large. Seeing all these notorious deeds, any 5-year-old child will agree that the current Chief Executive is just too vicious, venomous and heartless, utterly incompetent to be a shepherd.

With all these said, we simply want to remind fellow members and friends our University’s motto “Sapentia et Virtus”. Never, ever compromise our long established righteousness.

The Hong Kong University Students’ Union
1 February 2015