- 閱讀權限
- 90
- 最後登錄
- 16-1-20
- 精華
- 0
- UID
- 82666
- 帖子
- 32752
- 積分
- 127
- 註冊時間
- 03-6-26
- 在線時間
- 5834 小時
- UID
- 82666
- 帖子
- 32752
- 積分
- 127
- Good
- 1295
- 註冊時間
- 03-6-26
- 在線時間
- 5834 小時
|
ONE STEP BACKWARDS, TWO STEPS FORWARDS
Crisp early passes zipped into feet while, off the ball, players in red shirts peel left and right: this season there have been spells of the swiftest pass-and-move I've seen in a long time.
I've already seen enough to feel assured that the Reds will cut plenty of teams to ribbons. I don't think the club has ever had a group of quicker players in midfield and attack, but each allies speed with good movement and a comfort on the ball.
But it's not enough to satisfy everyone.
I do despair at some of the criticism the Reds receive in the press. Yes, I'm wholeheartedly biased. And, in fairness, you can't expect people who also have to focus on 19 other clubs to fully understand Liverpool. But even so, some of the stuff that gets written boggles my mind.
One broadsheet journalist, who shall remain nameless, said Liverpool should not be relying on great goals from youngsters, and added that but for Agger's wonder goal and what the writer felt was a dubious penalty at Bramall Lane, the Reds would have just one point this season following £34m investment since January.
So basically, if Liverpool hadn't scored the goals they have scored – be that a great goal by a young player or a penalty – they would not have scored enough goals.
It actually provides me with a good platform to highlight the improvements already apparent this season, in what are admittedly still early days.
For starters, £5.8m of the aforementioned £34m was spent on Daniel Agger. Young defenders make me nervous – with the exception of this Dane. He's a thoroughbred. The Reds will always miss Jamie Carragher's unceasing consistency and leadership – Agger isn't at that level at such a tender age – but Benítez spent money to provide cover (initially), and he bought who I believe to be the best young centre-back in world football. I cannot see how having a centre-back capable of passing beautifully and scoring long-range goals, as well as defending intelligently, is a bad thing?
While going over every aspect of the Reds' play in fine detail for 'The Red Review', both myself and Oliver Anderson identified a whole host of strengths and deficiencies in the Reds' game; many will have been obvious to fans (even if the extent might not have been 100% clear), others less so. The knowledge gained from working on the book has changed how I view matches this season. There are far too many issues to cover here, but I'll provide a couple of examples to make it clear how differently the Reds are already operating.
One area that disappointed last season was goals from defenders; especially when compared with Chelsea's total. While both defences did what they are paid to, in keeping 20-or-so Premiership clean sheets, Chelsea's John Terry and William Gallas also scored nine league goals between them.
Last season John Arne Riise's goals came when he played in midfield (as did Stephen Warnock's single strike), while Hyypia, Carragher and Finnan scored two, one and no goals respectively. In the league, however, the total figure falls to just Sami Hyypia's winner at Wigan.
So far this season both Riise and Agger have scored when playing in the back four. Their goals involved advancing with the ball from very deep positions; so not only did they score while playing in defence, they actually received the ball in defence: remarkable. Meanwhile, if Fabio Aurelio hasn't scored by May I'll eat my keyboard.
These long-range strikes were no accident. Last season the Reds scored a phenomenal 26 goals from outside the box, making it a staggering 48 since Benítez took over.
How many did the team concede from that distance in 2005/06? Two. And one of those was the miss-hit cross in the very last game, the FA Cup Final against West Ham. Already the Reds are halfway to conceding that total, but again it's an outrageous Hammers' fluke accounting for that stat.
The opposition defenders backed off Agger on Saturday, as had the Chelsea back four when Riise advanced in Cardiff. A lot of people in football think dropping to the edge of the area is the right thing to do, but at the other end of the pitch Liverpool tend to hold a higher line and rarely retreat in this way. It means space in behind, to which the back four are susceptible from a canny pass, but face little chance of an opponent lamping one in from 25 yards (not to be confused with Lamparding one in, which involves a minimum of two deflections).
However, while long-range efforts are the stock-in-trade of so many of this Liverpool team, and therefore their shooting should be encouraged, not criticised, close range goals were really lacking from the Reds' play in 2005/06.
In the first 49 games of last season, Liverpool only scored five times from inside the six-yard box. Such alarming – and telling – statistics highlighted the need for poachers, and it's no coincidence that the figure swiftly rose to 19 after Robbie Fowler found his form, and others followed suit. But 19 was still seven short of the long-range total, which seems an odd balance.
What took 49 games last season has almost been reached in just five this time around, with four six-yard box strikes already. Peter Crouch has really come to life in this respect. All three of his goals this season have been from that range. Mark Gonzalez got the other, against Maccabi Haifa, while Craig Bellamy's goal in the same game was actually even closer in, but from a more acute angle, and thus just outside the white line.
It took Crouch until March – seven months – to score his first close-range goal last season, although he did quickly follow it with three more. Crosses from the byline are now helping him increase his goal threat.
Of the £34m mentioned earlier, almost one-third went on Dirk Kuyt, who has only played 38 minutes in a red shirt, and who could have bagged a hat-trick. So it's plain daft to use that against Benítez. Early evidence from Saturday, backed up by his goals in Holland, suggests Kuyt will score all types of goals. A lack of league goals from the Reds' strikers was another area in need of addressing, and I'll be staggered if this guy doesn't deliver. All four main strikers are capable of getting into double figures in the league.
It's hugely encouraging to see a striker get five or more chances in a game, even if they miss them all. When Peter Crouch wasn't scoring last season I was always encouraged by how many chances he was getting, and that's backed up by how prolific he now is; I encountered comparisons with Crouch and Heskey, but I never saw a similarity. Big Emile had a lot of plus points, and could make even a steroid-fed ox look effeminate when on his game, but I never saw him missing many chances when he wasn't scoring; without getting into the right positions you stand no chance.
Sometimes new players impress early on, then fade away. Either they initially flattered to deceive, perhaps flying on adrenaline, or they are good players who lose confidence and never recover. But Kuyt did so many different things well it's hard not to feel excited about the impact he can make. Coming on as a sub in your first Premiership game, especially one so frenetic and end-to-end, can be a tough ask. In his favour there was space to play in, as West Ham pushed forward. But boy did he make good use of it.
It's rare for such a predator to also be so generous and aware. Twice he played those Bergkamp-type passes into a runner, and I wasn't expecting this side of his game to be so developed. I've encountered a lot of talk about Kuyt and Crouch vying for the starting berth, but I think all four main strikers at the club can dovetail in effective pairings. Some share similarities, but each is by and large unique. No pairing looks wrong to me.
These days Fowler, as the best passer, is probably the most adept at dropping deep to link midfield and attack, although it's already clear Kuyt can pick up the ball between the lines, to work shooting opportunities for himself or others. Bellamy, as the only striker with truly blistering pace, is the most effective of the four at drifting into wide areas or playing on the shoulder of the last defender. Kuyt looks good in the air, but when Crouch gets it right he can be simply unplayable in this sense. Each is extremely comfortable on the ball, and that's crucial for moves not breaking down.
While there are clear improvements on last season in the attacking sense, it's been a slight reversal at the other end of the pitch.
Is it early season rustiness? Or the lack of the two most reliable defenders last season? Or the absence of the one man 'two-man' midfield: namely Momo Sissoko (the only player who does so much closing down he appears to be in two places at once.) Or is the more open approach, with skilful wingers pushing forward, leaving a few more gaps for the opposition to exploit?
Arguably it's a bit of all four. But if it ends up being a case of one step backwards, two steps forwards, we'll be in for a great season. |
|
樓主: 奧雲仔仔
發表於 06-8-30 05:05 PM
